Dear Mother of God! [Archive]

Geno

06-02-2005, 6:07 PM

The Navbar is gone! Oh noes!

Woe is me.
You must adjust to the new menu system. We'll be messing with it, but it's the newer, simpler design.

Member's List is accessible via User CP, other links weren't needed.

Holy crap... I thought I had become a mod or something... I saw this cool looking drop down box, and was like "HOLY CRAP!" and all... Guess wishing on a star doesn't help >.<

But it looks cool! Really! I hope this stays, as well. It's on every screen, I take it? I see it now, I saw it searching all forums... If it's everywhere, I like it. Very simple interface ^.^

~Larry "Geno" Meyers
- BI's RP forum Aide

Nahotnoj

06-02-2005, 6:09 PM

hehe... when I logged on I was like "wtf, the navbar is gone" then after getting tired of the odd annoying grey box hovering in the corner of my screen, I waved my mouse over it and realized it was for navigation...

I like the new nav... very... compressed.

Mtank

06-02-2005, 6:11 PM

I didnt even notice it until i read this thread.

now it feels weird... :(

Whiteknight

06-02-2005, 7:06 PM

Sigh... I've always not been one for sidebars.

Spartan-II

06-02-2005, 7:09 PM

Heh, same here Mtank. I ws like "O_o It's gone.."

06-02-2005, 7:09 PM

You know you've never been someone for what I change around here. :p

Protoss_Honor

06-02-2005, 7:23 PM

I think it is cool. Good job OH GREAT AND POWERFUL WARBOARDS DIETY! (always helps to suck up to the boss. Eh'?)

Markpyro

06-02-2005, 7:26 PM

Not too fond of it, but, Im glad I put a "new posts" link in my tabs in firefox.

Darkslayer633

06-02-2005, 7:41 PM

I like it... definantally good, one major problem I have is that the new posts thing is gone so mabye you could um... put it back.

Neo

06-02-2005, 7:45 PM

uhm. wtf the header is naked now! The menu is nifty, but uhm... sooo tiny :(

-Neo

CODEZERO

06-02-2005, 8:08 PM

ahhhhh its all gone....nvm i see it
sooo empty......

DragonPaladin

06-02-2005, 8:09 PM

I didn't notice the navbar gone, but i did notice the box thingy.

Schwitzer

06-02-2005, 9:17 PM

uhm. wtf the header is naked now! The menu is nifty, but uhm... sooo tiny :(
It's not the size of the nav-bar that matters... it's how you use it. :P

DragonPaladin

06-02-2005, 10:01 PM

It's not the size of the nav-bar that matters... it's how you use it.

That's strangely...disturbing.

BlackHawk

06-02-2005, 10:04 PM

I was like Mtank. I was like "where's the menu..." and I kept scrolling up and down with my mouse. I thought the grey box was some sort of bad coding and a stray pic. Then I rolled over it and realized it was a menu...

Then I looked in the mIRC channel and noticed AJ talking about it. I don't mind, it's not bad; but not the greatest thing ever.

GrassDragon

06-02-2005, 10:08 PM

I thought it was some bad coding too actually. AJ, maybe get Feng to make it pretty?

All we need now is the ability to put links to favorite threads/forums there :P

06-02-2005, 10:50 PM

You guys suck, yeh know that?
Edge and I work on adding some cool new functionality and the first thing you all complain about is how not pretty it is.

It's intent is to be low-bandwidth, high-compatibility, low-resource replacement to an eyesore of a navbar. It uses less screen space and offers more flexibility on my part.

But in response, yes we'll work on its appearance.

/me notes that the New Posts link has returned.

bluemicrobyte

06-02-2005, 10:54 PM

Personally I liked the big oversized bandwidth hogging navbar, but this new design definately has great potential. The way it appears when you hover your mouse over it is neat.

Kamikazie190

06-02-2005, 10:55 PM

The old navbar wasn't eyesore.

And I really, really like how it scrolls down the screen with you. The top feels a bit naked, but I definately like the new one.

GrassDragon

06-02-2005, 11:30 PM

Edge and I work on adding some cool new functionality and the first thing you all complain about is how not pretty it is.
This is a pretty good looking website, we have expectations :P

And I really, really like how it scrolls down the screen with you. The top feels a bit naked, but I definately like the new one.
It does? Not in Safari... I'd assume it's a fixed positioning CSS thing, but that's supposed to work in Safari?

Whiteknight

06-02-2005, 11:48 PM

It's intent is to be low-bandwidth, high-compatibility, low-resource replacement to an eyesore of a navbar. It uses less screen space and offers more flexibility on my part.

Bah, who wants low-bandwidth when you can have a high-powered, cpu sucking, incredibly extravagant sidebar that is loaded up with every single thing possible? ;)

Mmm, new posts. Eh, I suppose I'll grow to like it, eventually. Like most things.

The_Maker

06-02-2005, 11:56 PM

I didnt even notice it until i read this thread.

now it feels weird... :(
Yeah, now its just... yeagh. Weird. :confused:

Modred

06-03-2005, 12:46 AM

I personally like a forum home link, but if it isn't reimplemented I'll just do what I always did--hit home and click the link there.

TranquilNightElf

06-03-2005, 1:14 AM

I noticed the refreshing space and more room where the navbar used to be(^_^)
And for the most part was like Mtank
".... what's this grey thingy over here....OH.. here we go .. Nice!"
I like it that it scrolls down with you.

and erm....
This is a pretty good looking website, we have expectations :P
Darn right :P

Hawthorne

06-03-2005, 1:49 AM

It took me 2 seconds to realize that the nav bar was gone and 1 second to realize the thing at the end was the new nav bar :)

Yes I am smarter than you!

Well it' cool, uses less space, compatible and useful.

Hawthorne

BlackHawk

06-03-2005, 12:18 PM

At school and using IE it doesn't follow my mouse, but instead it will slowly fade from the previous spot and then reload at the top left of the viewing area. Just thought you might like to know.

hammocksleeper

06-03-2005, 12:56 PM

I like the new nav menu a lot. It just takes some getting used to...although one way I think it could be improved is by adding text on it to make it more visible, like "Navigation" or something.

singo

06-03-2005, 5:56 PM

Well, I just have to be different dont I?

I dont really like it, too small, annoying and, well, mobile.....

I dont suppose there is ever going to be an option to have the real thing back is there?

Modred

06-03-2005, 5:59 PM

Eros

06-03-2005, 8:02 PM

It's ugly, and kinda pointless.

Not all that noticeable, either. :\

hammocksleeper

06-03-2005, 9:12 PM

At school and using IE it doesn't follow my mouse, but instead it will slowly fade from the previous spot and then reload at the top left of the viewing area. Just thought you might like to know.

It's designed to fade in rather than continually follow the screen to cut down on performance requirements. However firefox apparently doesn't support the fading feature, and therefore puts a greater strain on the server and your computer.

Modred

06-04-2005, 12:05 AM

It's designed to fade in rather than continually follow the screen to cut down on performance requirements.
Did AJ tell you that, or are you making it up? As I recall, he said he was simply testing a different style. But if he told you different, please post your log. Or get him to vouch for that claim.

Black.Ice

06-04-2005, 4:24 PM

I propose something to the effect of this. (http://www.faisalm.com/wb/)

You were planning on putting an image there at one point or another... right? Right???

06-04-2005, 4:57 PM

that'll do for now, thanks. : )

BlackHawk

06-04-2005, 5:29 PM

I like it better now, with the gradiant that matches the site's colour scheme and 'MENU' written on it so you can't miss it (well...you could, it's just a tad bit harder). Keep the updatse coming! (How about fixing that Arcade Tournament problem next?) xD.

Whiteknight

06-05-2005, 12:40 AM

Can you have it rounded slightly? [/whine] :)

Basan

06-05-2005, 3:21 PM

Noticed it better when trading a PM with a felaa that isn't around here that much lately. ;)
Eh, liked it. It's a tad different than the ol' one but we get used to it. :tup: Altough I still don't know what's that "new posts" thingy all about. Maybe tomorrow I'll tweak with it to find out. :)

And it's far better thant that attempt to make a new WB's layout... :devil:

Whiteknight

06-05-2005, 11:26 PM

There's no member's list! :concern:

Basan

06-06-2005, 4:37 AM

There's no member's list! :concern:

Meh, from what I've read it's available through your User CP area. :poke:
/me advises some reading over the whole deal (as in topic) * ;)

kongurous

06-11-2005, 5:40 PM

And it's far better thant that attempt to make a new WB's layout... :devil:

Hell yea. Now, as for the new menu... well, considering I've been fixing a 50-year-old computer for 6 months(I hate my ship), its a welcome change... for 3 seconds. The Java IRC client seems pointless to me(go-go gadget ChatZilla!), and so does this. Thumbs-down but nice attempt to save some bandwith and money. So, watcha gonna do with the free bandwith? Make a taco?

06-11-2005, 6:23 PM

do you honestly think that i enjoy/need to read messages like that?
if you don't like it okay, tell me why.. however ragging on the extra efforts we put in, is not welcome.

Schwitzer

06-11-2005, 6:28 PM

I think some people need to realise - and be grateful for - the efforts and personal costs that go into maintaining this site so they can whine about every little thing they possibly can.

BlackHawk

06-12-2005, 12:43 AM

do you honestly think that i enjoy/need to read messages like that?
if you don't like it okay, tell me why.. however ragging on the extra efforts we put in, is not welcome.

It's okay AJ I less than three you.

Whiteknight

06-12-2005, 1:13 AM

Like all things you introduce, I'm already used to it. :P

kongurous

06-12-2005, 2:59 AM

do you honestly think that i enjoy/need to read messages like that?
if you don't like it okay, tell me why.. however ragging on the extra efforts we put in, is not welcome.

I don't think you enjoy/need it. You, from what I can tell, don't enjoy/need this site. Also, from what I can tell, you don't like me very much. Now, on to why I'm even responding. I don't like your java IRC client. Why? Not as big for reading as, say, ChatZilla, and the ability to change your text colour. Using white text on the white background has been used time and time again to make AppleJuice(or any of its monikers)say stupid stuff or to spam gratuitously. I don't like the new menu. Why? Too small. The navbar was something I could actually read from any sort of short distance. The new menu, I have to get close to see the small print. My eyes suck. I can still read without glasses, but its too small for my tastes.

I think some people need to realise - and be grateful for - the efforts and personal costs that go into maintaining this site so they can whine about every little thing they possibly can.

And I think some people need to realise what is their business and isn't. I would gladly pay to maintain this site, because I'm paid enough each week to support a $400 dollar endeavour, and I have more than 10 times that amount in my bank account. In fact, I do run my own site. I pay to maintain the Rome Total Realism modsite, and from the amount of traffic it gets, things get pretty pricey. You should be glad I'm taking minutes out of my busy and time-constrained day to come here, when I could be making to do skins for Rome Total Realism, pay my expenses, earn my pay, fix some of my broken computers, the list goes on and on. You can do all the effort you want, it all comes down to the members to come here and make that effort worthwhile, or to listen to a few complaints to see how to make the site better or easier to learn. I'm not saying the IRC client and smaller menu make the site worse, I just don't see a use for them.

Graeme

06-12-2005, 1:06 PM

I don't like your java IRC client. Why? Not as big for reading as, say, ChatZilla, and the ability to change your text colour. Using white text on the white background has been used time and time again to make AppleJuice(or any of its monikers)say stupid stuff or to spam gratuitously.
The new Java IRC client isn't meant to be mandatory for all IRC users. I still use mIRC, and I'm sure most people still use their IRC clients of choice. The Java IRC client was offerred as an alternative to those who did not want to, or could not, download an IRC client.

As far as changing text colour - every IRC client has the ability to do that. For mIRC, it's ctrl + k. I'm not sure what the command is for Chatzilla, but if you look around a bit, I'm sure you'll be able to find it ^_^.

I don't like the new menu. Why? Too small. The navbar was something I could actually read from any sort of short distance. The new menu, I have to get close to see the small print. My eyes suck. I can still read without glasses, but its too small for my tastes.
The new menu is affected by the 'View -> Text Size'. If you're having trouble seeing the menu, I would recommend changing the default text size to 'Larger' instead of 'Medium'.

kongurous

06-12-2005, 1:10 PM

The new Java IRC client isn't meant to be mandatory for all IRC users. I still use mIRC, and I'm sure most people that used IRC in the past still use their IRC client of choice. The Java IRC client was offerred as an alternative to those who did not want to, or could not, download an IRC client.

I know that, but my assessment is that it cannot compete with ChatZilla. I never said it was mandatory, nor did I say it was meant to be mandatory.

The new menu is affected by the 'View -> Text Size'. If you're having trouble seeing the menu, I would recommend changing the default text size to 'Larger' instead of 'Medium'.

Its not just the text, its the menu just hangin' there. It just doesn't jive with me.

Graeme

06-12-2005, 1:15 PM

I know that, but my assessment is that it cannot compete with ChatZilla. I never said it was mandatory, nor did I say it was meant to be mandatory.
Ok then, don't let it compete with ChatZilla. I, nor any staff members, have any qualms with you continuing to use ChatZilla instead of the default Java client. I don't see how this has anything to do with our site though?

Its not just the text, its the menu just hangin' there. It just doesn't jive with me.
Give it a week without a pessimistic attitude about it and you'll forget the menu ever changed :).

BlackHawk

06-12-2005, 2:17 PM

I know that, but my assessment is that it cannot compete with ChatZilla. I never said it was mandatory, nor did I say it was meant to be mandatory.

It's not like WB is some sort of business trying to make a product to compete with ChatZilla; it's just a tool for those that may not be able to download mIRC (public computer, school, etc.)

kongurous

06-12-2005, 2:37 PM

It's not like WB is some sort of business trying to make a product to compete with ChatZilla; it's just a tool for those that may not be able to download mIRC (public computer, school, etc.)

...have you paid no attention to me? I already know, I NEVER FUCKING SAID IT HAD TO COMPETE.

Black.Ice

06-12-2005, 3:39 PM

No offense, Kongurous, but why do you dislike it then? If you're not using it; you don't even have to browse to the page. Therefore, it's of no use to you.

Also, I don't think AJ was upset at your comments about the changes in the site, it was mostly about the "Thumbs-down but nice attempt to save some bandwith and money. So, watcha gonna do with the free bandwith? Make a taco?"

That was a low-blow. :/

BlackHawk

06-12-2005, 4:09 PM

...have you paid no attention to me? I already know, I NEVER FUCKING SAID IT HAD TO COMPETE.

If you looked at the quote I had in the post, you did:

I know that, but my assessment is that it cannot compete with ChatZilla.

Excuse you.

That's the last I'm going to say on this, I have no reason to make this into a giant flame war.

madman5

06-12-2005, 4:28 PM

I think everyone should just shut the fuck up and return to the topic. Your choice of IRC client does not matter at all. You are all acting like children and it disgusts me.

~madman5: Resident GAMEPRO Advisor

Black.Ice

06-12-2005, 4:45 PM

Alright, I believe all discussion pertaining to the new navigation menu is over. Nothing can really be accomplished with this thread. If you would still like to discuss the menu bar in detail, please create a new thread.

hammocksleeper

06-16-2005, 3:40 PM

IT"S THE SUPERMENU OMGGG!!

http://www.warboards.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=1755&stc=1

that being said I think aj is fiddling with it so it looks rounded and pretty :)

Protoss_Honor

06-16-2005, 3:51 PM

IT"S THE SUPERMENU OMGGG!!

http://www.warboards.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=1755&stc=1

that being said I think aj is fiddling with it so it looks rounded and pretty :)Oh, I thought that was just something wrong with my computer, but now I know that it is the website. So what exactly is the problem?

kongurous

06-16-2005, 3:55 PM

Its gone now. At least on mine.

Protoss_Honor

06-16-2005, 3:57 PM

It is gone on mine also. Why was it doing that in the first place?

Fenguin

06-16-2005, 7:52 PM

BlackHawk

06-16-2005, 10:23 PM

Sorry guys; the earlier problems were caused by me trying out something that turned out to have major bugs, then my internet dying so said bugs couldn't be fixed for a while.

Menu has been completely revamped into a prettier interface. :)

Edit: There may still be a little bug present on the menu but there were only two ways I could do it, and so I went with the slightly-less-buggy of the ways. Haha.

It looks nice. The only problem (I assume this is the bug) is that it expands and when you move away it stays expanded (you have to roll-over it again to minimize it). Other then that teeny tiny problem it's very nice and goes with the forum skin nicely.

Modred

06-17-2005, 12:07 AM

The new one is too wide. It overlaps with the left borders of the posts and, in my opinion, that looks horrible. The expanding is also much less smooth than the previous attempt, and as others have mentioned, it does not properly close.

Correction: It overlaps with the left border of the view of a forum and in places such as advanced posting, editing, and UserCP.

T-Dawg

06-17-2005, 12:28 AM

The expanding bug is less a bug, more a .. precise way of doing it correctly. Heh.
You just have to make sure you roll over it else it can not recognize your mouse scroll and stay active.

In terms of it overlapping, that's an extremely minimal overlap.. I think you're being far too critical of it.

hidiho2

06-17-2005, 12:30 AM

Oooh shiny. Very small and much easier to access than the old one. I don't have any problems with it, but maybe its been fixed now. I didn't like that with the old menu bar, you would have to scroll all the way up. Goes great with the layout of WB, did I mention shiny!?!

GrassDragon

06-17-2005, 12:41 AM

Works perfectly with mine (aside from the fact that it doesn't follow my scrolling and there's no animation, but I didn't have that before). My only real issue is that it was anti-aliased for white and the header (which is the only place is shows up for me) isn't white.

Sperate

06-17-2005, 1:04 AM

I have to agree with Kong here. I really don't like it. I don't see the point, besides saving bandwidth. That adds up I suppose..but I liked the static bar better. Easier to access, and cleaner.

Course, I don't like the entire WB theme as it is, so just ignore me. (too light, if you must know)

Basan

06-17-2005, 5:33 AM

Menu has been completely revamped into a prettier interface.

Indeed. Much more pleasing to the eye than that blocky one (even without my glasses :P). A definitive :tup:.

Edit: There may still be a little bug present on the menu but there were only two ways I could do it, and so I went with the slightly-less-buggy of the ways. Haha.

Lem'me guess... It doesn't retract always to the menu button after hovered with lil' mousie. You've gotta hover it twice for it to close.
But since this is the 'Forum related issues' area, this is meant to know our opinions of it for making general improvement, right (Modred)? ;)
/me 's almost sure it will get fixed *

And to the many that are against it, bohoo. (Mainly Orodreth n' Kong' now.) Get over it, at least it didn't crashed the site (wich isn't ours anyway, I might add). :devil:
In due time you'll addapt to it nicely. ;)
/me hopes this doesn't escalate to pointless debate / eventual flamin' *

Nuts

06-17-2005, 7:55 AM

because I'm paid enough each week to support a $400 dollar endeavour, and I have more than 10 times that amount in my bank account.

You have $4000? Woooooowowowow, you're rich!

As for the new navbar, marked improvement, I like it very much. At first I was a bit put off by the obtuse nature of the design, but now it looks very much in tune with the rest of the site. Good job.

hammocksleeper

06-17-2005, 10:31 AM

The navbar retracts perfectly fine for me, maybe you guys should switch to IE. The bug that I'm getting is that it flickers as you mouse over the links, and Feng says this is a problem with the javascripting, that there's not much he can do about it.

Basan

06-17-2005, 11:21 AM

The navbar retracts perfectly fine for me, maybe you guys should switch to IE. ...

Not in here, not in here... (please.) :rolleyes:

Protogod

06-17-2005, 2:18 PM

not a bad idea with the menu bar, but i think there's this glitch (for me anyway) where i move my cursor away, and it doesnt go away. i dont know if its supposed to do that or not

Fenguin

06-17-2005, 3:03 PM

The new one is too wide. It overlaps with the left borders of the posts and, in my opinion, that looks horrible. The expanding is also much less smooth than the previous attempt, and as others have mentioned, it does not properly close.
I'll scale it down a bit. The second bug is pretty weird; I'll probably work on it some more today to see if I can find a fix for it.

Works perfectly with mine (aside from the fact that it doesn't follow my scrolling and there's no animation, but I didn't have that before). My only real issue is that it was anti-aliased for white and the header (which is the only place is shows up for me) isn't white.
Hehe, if only PNG alpha layers worked on IE... :]

The navbar retracts perfectly fine for me, maybe you guys should switch to IE. The bug that I'm getting is that it flickers as you mouse over the links, and Feng says this is a problem with the javascripting, that there's not much he can do about it.
Probably the same bug as above; I'll find a better way to do it soon.

TranquilNightElf

06-17-2005, 4:09 PM

Looks way more sleek :)..Good Job! ^_^

tiny rant.. the menu lickers when I move from one link to the other and instead of retracting on moving the mouse away it disappears.

Fenguin

06-17-2005, 4:47 PM

Updated. Now it's smaller and doesn't flicker.

hammocksleeper

06-17-2005, 4:58 PM

Updated. Now it's smaller and doesn't flicker.

omg I love you! :) AJ are you gonna let him one-up you like that?

Modred

06-17-2005, 5:40 PM

Fenguin

06-17-2005, 5:43 PM

Just a curious observation:

The part that says "Menu" is only smaller when it's expanded. Is that intentional?

EDIT: Strangely enough, it's been fixed already... I guess I just caught it in that one moment of not being ready.
Your browser refreshed the image in its cache. :] The non-expanded and expanded versions use different images.

Sperate

06-17-2005, 8:05 PM

Basan: I can live with it easy enough..just seems like time that could be better used elsewhere. It's the little things that count though, I suppose, and if it pleases the majority, eh. I'll deal.

TranquilNightElf

06-17-2005, 10:33 PM

Updated. Now it's smaller and doesn't flicker.

Looks excellent :D
Go Go The Penguin ^_^

Schwitzer

06-18-2005, 2:33 AM

Oh hello... Fenguin's back and about. :)

psycho42b

06-18-2005, 9:47 AM

Hmm, the new navbar or whatever you call it, eh? I would like it, IF I COULD GET TO THE ARCADE!!!!!!!!!! Everytime I go below log out, it closes. somebody please fix this, before I inflict horiible computer doom upon *at this point , I just started rambling*

kongurous

06-18-2005, 2:49 PM

psycho42b

06-18-2005, 5:06 PM

Dude, just memorize where the arcade is on the menu, and open it from there. Not that hard .
And just how does one do this, when the menu keeps closing below the logout?

edit: on second thought, it appears to have been fixed. yay!

kongurous

06-18-2005, 5:09 PM

.
And just how does one do this, when the menu keeps closing below the logout?

edit: on second thought, it appears to have been fixed. yay!

Ok, before it was fixed, you would open the menu. Then, you'd look for arcade, remember its position, and then move your mouse to it. Yes, the menu would have closed, but move your curser again, and you'll have selected the arcade.

psycho42b

06-19-2005, 12:38 AM

It's broken again. Oh, I don't see how your trick could work.

Ok, before it was fixed, you would open the menu. Then, you'd look for arcade, remember its position, and then move your mouse to it. Yes, the menu would have closed, but move your curser again, and you'll have selected the arcade.

In case you didnt notice, when the menu closes, it only opens by moving the cursor back the menu bar. The link becomes non-existant until the menu is opended. How would the arcade then be selected if there is no link to begin with? when the menus closes, the link goes with it. The only way to reopen the link is to reopen the menu. the only way to reopen the menu is to put the cursor over the "icon" thingy-ma-bob, but when the cursor goes below the logout, the link becomes non-existant until the menu is reopend. moving the cursor to the links location therefore becomes uselss. Perhaps I would have a better understanding of this if you could show me in some way.

kongurous

06-19-2005, 12:48 AM

Perhaps I would have a better understanding of this if you could show me in some way.

Ok, open your menu bar. Then, look where the arcade link is. Then, move your curser to where it is, and then the bar closes. Move your curser again, and the menu will open, and your curser will be on the arcade link.

Edgewize

06-19-2005, 1:03 AM

This new menu sucks! It closes itself when I try to go to the arcarde, unless I turn my font size down.

... don't worry, we'll fix it ;)

Protoss_Honor

06-19-2005, 1:17 AM

This new menu sucks! It closes itself when I try to go to the arcarde, unless I turn my font size down.

... don't worry, we'll fix it ;) OMG! EDGEWIZE! OMG! OMG! OMG! IT'S EDGEWIZE!!!!!!!!!!!1! j/k Hey nice to finally get to see you post Edgewize.
Now, back to our regularly scheduled post.
I have come to say that I have absolutly no complaints about the new menu. (I figured it would be a relief after so many people complaining about problems.) Good job on the new menu Mods! It's great! I love it!

hammocksleeper

06-19-2005, 12:06 PM

This is a bad, bad bug that keeps happening...the menu doesn't expand when you mouse over it! It happens sometimes, I've noticed when you are on page two of a thread. And sometimes if you click a link on the page rather than hitting the back button to go to a different page, the menu will still not expand on the next page either. Is anyone else experiencing this?

Edgewize

06-19-2005, 12:29 PM

I was just tweaking it. How about now?

hammocksleeper

06-19-2005, 12:59 PM

I was just tweaking it. How about now?

sure :)

Basan

06-20-2005, 4:59 AM

Basan: I can live with it easy enough..just seems like time that could be better used elsewhere. It's the little things that count though, I suppose, and if it pleases the majority, eh. I'll deal.

Wt ...!?! :o And where (else) may I ask? :P
If the menu now follows our page view display, it's way better imo. That way I won't have to browse back up to see it (yeah, yeah... it's a lazzy @** excuse). :smirk:

Btw, go read back (if you haven't) n' you'll see the main intentions about reducing the menu size and appearance (aka more free bandwidth and PM's storage available).