View Full Version : Format of url tag
Exedore
02-20-2004, 2:35 AM
When posts are made that use the url tag (http://www.warboards.org) (for hyperlinks), it's often hard to pick the link out of the text unless you know where to possibly mouseover. Can the color and/or format (add an underline for example) be changed so that they can be identified just by glancing at the post?
There's a url link in this post. See if you can find it without having to search line by line.
SexForTwo
02-20-2004, 4:02 AM
The [url] tag is a shade lighter. ;)
Yes, it should be changed, took me ages to find it. But then again I use the hand as a cursor. ;)
Schwitzer
02-20-2004, 4:22 AM
I found it straight away, but that was out of sheer luck. It would be much better if the format was changed to make it more obvious.
BSTRhino
02-20-2004, 4:26 AM
I think the only reason that URL tag was lighter in this case was because I had already visited http://www.warboards.org
Edit: After testing, it seems (http://www.nowhereinparticularblahblah.com) that's not true, the URL is always a shade lighter, for visited and non-visited links. Just like in this sentence.
pixels
02-20-2004, 10:05 AM
I have no problem spotting them, however it blends in a bit too much :\
I have no problem spotting them, however it blends in a bit too much :\
Yeah. It's much too light...I'd go with Exedore's suggestion of adding an underline or something.
Just bold or strong it. It can stay the same color, but can stand out a bit.
http://www.kupatrix.com/neo
Neos personal Images of dooooooooom or something.
Nvm, it seems bolding changes its color ;( GOGO CSS.
-Neo
Fenguin
02-20-2004, 12:22 PM
I will change it soon. Like now. :)
EDIT: Yup. Changed. (blah)
Mordecai2k
02-20-2004, 7:33 PM
make links pink ok thx .
BSTRhino
02-20-2004, 7:47 PM
Isn't CSS great?
Fenguin
02-20-2004, 7:49 PM
CSS is awesome. If only I could learn how to do those awesome CSS tablethings that seem to be the craze nowadays. ;)
CSS is awesome. If only I could learn how to do those awesome CSS tablethings that seem to be the craze nowadays. ;)
Bah layers are so lame.
-Neo
Schwitzer
02-20-2004, 10:24 PM
</childish arguments>
Ok Im lame if you admit layers are lame :)
-Neo
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.