PDA

View Full Version : The Empire: Evil Megalomaniacs or Misunderstood Regime


ScottieIWU
06-27-2006, 1:30 PM
Well, I have always loved Star Wars, but since my summer job is babysitting my 4 month old nephew from 6 am - 6 pm during the week, and since he tends to sleep at least 7-8 of those 12 hrs that I watch him, I have a lot of spare time.

For that reason, I just read the Thrawn Trilogy of Star Wars books by Timothy Zahn, followed by the Hand of Thrawn duology, and I'm now resuming the X-Wing series of books at the fifth one. With all of this Star Wars, I started reading Wikipedia yesterday to get a little history and brush up on books that I may not get around to.

Upon doing this, I discovered that I wasn't alone in my "sympathizing" with the Empire. Jonathan Last wrote an article "The Case for the Empire (http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/248ipzbt.asp)" in which he gives brief, but somewhat convincing arguments for the Empire not being nearly as evil as it seems.

So for this reason I guess I was interested in what people had to say about this, using the Star Wars Universe as evidence to support these assertions. For the purpose of this discussion, I will include the movies and the EU (books, games, comics), though arguments involving the EU should hold considerably less value than those coming directly from the movies, since those are absolutely official. For the mods, I understand this may be more suited to the entertainment section, as it relates to that kind of thing, but if any of you read this and deem it acceptable, perhaps we could move it to ML to get more traffic?

As for my views, I'll type up a few brief points and will elaborate on any as required. Some of my arguments are taken from Last, and I won't credit him directly but will say that if you recognize the argument, chances are it's his, or an elaboration on his argument. Many, at the same time, are my own.

I. The Old Republic

Starting nearly as far back as Knights of the Old Republic we begin to see signs that the Old Republic is nothing but a bureaucracy that is failing its citizens nearly as far back as inception. The Mandalorian wars ripped the galaxy apart and the Old Republic was so dependent on the Jedi Order (whose arrogance and insistence on inaction nearly doomed the galaxy) that the galaxy nearly fell until Revan came to aid the struggle. After this, the Jedi Civil war ripped the galaxy apart even more, leading to the utter demolition of many planets that the Old Republic simply could not adequately protect with its own fleet. Later, as the Republic attempts to stay together they face failure after failure to restore life to planets and to ensure the safety of their citizens.

In the times just before the rise of the Empire, we see a Republic that is utter bureaucracy and that fails to protect a world that is under blockade by the Trade Federation. When the Clone Wars start, could there not have been a peaceful solution? As Last points out, a Republic based on freedom should surely not be opposed to a secessionist movement? It's "freedom" yet they're not free to leave. That sounds almost as bad as the Empire people demonize and later try to topple.

As Last also points out, Palpatine seems to be acting in the favor of the universe, in the favor of order and efficacy. While he is a sith lord, and Sith are known for deception, it seemed that Palpatine followed through on his promise to ensure order and stability.

II. Rebel Alliance

Surely the Rebel Alliance, to the Empire itself, was little more than a group of terrorists trying to bring down the state. This is comparable to the US war on terror now. The Empire is acting out of self-preservation against a group who would willingly kill their numbers in order to enact a "better" government. As last points out, it's interesting that during the movies there is little to no mention of what the new government would be. Only once the Empire falls does the Rebel Alliance seem to ever concern itself with how to govern the galaxy that it just "liberated."

Moreso, for all of the innocent people that the Empire supposedly killed, the Rebel Alliance is surely responsible for just as many deaths. The Death Star had a minimal crew compliment of 775,000 men. Surely not all of those people were evil, but many no doubt believed themselves to be serving the general good. In the Battle of Endor, we saw the deaths of thsoe on the Death Star II (those building it, and those crewing it) as well as the deaths of those on the Executor. The number of lives taken by the Rebellion just to end the Empire numbers at least in the millions alone in these two battles.

Last's argument involving Alderaan is interesting to read, and I suggest looking at it so I don't waste time retyping it. However, I will reiterate that Tarkin, as per my sig, said "fear will keep them in line." He did not ever insinuate that the galaxy would be kept in line by the destruction of every planet that rose against it. However, does the destruction of a planet of terrorist-supporters not speak volumes to others who might wish to join the Rebel cause?

I think I'll leave it at that for now, because this turned into a mountain, and I'll let others rebute my arguments or come up with new ones for the Empire. I have more to point out, including the EU times and how the destruction of countless planets by the Yuzhaan Vong is in many ways made worse by Luke's actions earlier in his life.

Let's hear what you guys have to say.

And on second thought, maybe this should go in IR, lol.

Kingscrab
06-27-2006, 2:10 PM
Let's hear what you guys have to say.

And on second thought, maybe this should go in IR, lol. I think one point you skipped though, was: The leaders of the Empire were clearly evil and insidious. Had they stepped down or been dethroned, the rebel alliance might have changed their tune, but that was never gonna happen. Thus, the only way to get to them was through battle and to take out their power base.

EDIT: Another point: Was Palpatine really acting (a) for the betterment of the galaxy or (b) did he simply see it as a chance to grab power for his own selfish reasons? He's an evil Sith, so yeah.(b)

ScottieIWU
06-27-2006, 3:25 PM
I think one point you skipped though, was: The leaders of the Empire were clearly evil and insidious. Had they stepped down or been dethroned, the rebel alliance might have changed their tune, but that was never gonna happen. Thus, the only way to get to them was through battle and to take out their power base.Other than the leadership being sometimes overly brutal in their anti-terrorist methods, there's little to no evidence in the movies of any oppression of anybody. In fact, in Mos Eisley the only evidence shows that the Stormtroopers were more of a non-presence than anything.

At Bespin, Lando was working an operation completely under the Empire's radar to avoid any regulations and restrictions. It's like trying to run an oil company under the US Gov'ts nose to avoid taxes and labor laws. It's illegal, so Darth Vader was really within the rights of the Empire to seize the operation.

And really, would you expect the leaders of the Empire to be nice to the terrorists trying to overthrow them? To take them in and say "okay, let's have a pow-wow." I'd say the violent reaction as terrorists was somewhat warranted.

The xenophobia issue is pointed out a lot, but that never shows up until extended universe and even then is kinda contraversial. Many disagree with that assumption by authors and tend to discuss it as a means to actually make the Empire seem evil as they hadn't been before. However, that xenophobia was shown in many lights, often later in the EU being shown as an eccentricity of the Emperor and not the entire body of the empire. Moreover, the Emperor did elevate Thrawn, a non-human, to the level of Grand Adimral.

EDIT: Another point: Was Palpatine really acting (a) for the betterment of the galaxy or (b) did he simply see it as a chance to grab power for his own selfish reasons? He's an evil Sith, so yeah.(b)I guess that could be true, but there was also little evidence that Palpatine didn't do things for the betterment of the galaxy. It's entirely possible that he was powerful yet still benevolent. Yes, he is a sith, but so was Revan during the Jedi Civil war and he was attempting to unite the galaxy against a threat from the Unknown Regions that is yet to be known (though, based on events much later in galactic history I'd say it may well have been the Yuzhaan Vong he was attempting to prepare for, nto knowing when they might invade.)

Anyway, it is important to note that while the Emperor did have complete control, the Moffs were the ones that more adversely affected day-to-day life of citizens of the Empire, so regardless of the Emperor's overall intent or evil nature, the Moffs may have been benevolent or good to their citizens.

Kingscrab
06-27-2006, 3:44 PM
I guess that could be true, but there was also little evidence that Palpatine didn't do things for the betterment of the galaxy. It's entirely possible that he was powerful yet still benevolent. Sure, benevolent if you went along with his wishes. If not... Dead. It was all an act. Saying something is for the "betterment of the galaxy" is the only way he could get away with it... Palpatine didn't just wake up one day and realize "I am an evil Sith Lord". I assume it took him years to realize his full power and training. All the while he would have had to cloak his true nature and evil Sith status. He played everyone from day one, manipulating common fear and political turmoil to achieve his goal of absolute power.

Anyway, it is important to note that while the Emperor did have complete control, the Moffs were the ones that more adversely affected day-to-day life of citizens of the Empire, so regardless of the Emperor's overall intent or evil nature, the Moffs may have been benevolent or good to their citizens. Well... That may be true, but absolute power is still absolute power. Stalin could still have walked into Kiev after WWII was over and had the entire city including it's mayor executed at the drop of a hat, if it "served the greater good" of the country. At the end of the day, everyone still lives in fear, based on the whim of an evil tryant who has absolute power.

GenocideAlive
06-27-2006, 5:14 PM
I think one point you skipped though, was: The leaders of the Empire were clearly evil and insidious. Had they stepped down or been dethroned, the rebel alliance might have changed their tune, but that was never gonna happen. Thus, the only way to get to them was through battle and to take out their power base.

EDIT: Another point: Was Palpatine really acting (a) for the betterment of the galaxy or (b) did he simply see it as a chance to grab power for his own selfish reasons? He's an evil Sith, so yeah.(b)
Oh, blah blah BLAH. Screw the Rebel Alliance and the horse they rode in on.

Empire: Imperial March complete with asses kicked.

Rebel Alliance: Gay Pride March with disco ball and hot pants.

<3 Empire till I diah, bytches.

Kingscrab
06-27-2006, 5:29 PM
Rebel Alliance: Gay Pride March with disco ball and hot pants.

<3 Empire till I diah, bytches. Yeah... Whatevahs! You love that pulsating-hot-rebel-alliance-deathstarkilling-joyfilled-photon torpedo.

Search your heart... You know it's true. :ninja:

Dayoh
06-27-2006, 7:56 PM
Im a fan of SW, iv seen all the movies and own most, but i havent read any of the books that try to continue the story, for me SW ended when Darth Vader died, thats where the story ended, i dont think any books can have a better plot then the movie series (and books that accampany).

ScottieIWU
06-28-2006, 7:27 AM
Im a fan of SW, iv seen all the movies and own most, but i havent read any of the books that try to continue the story, for me SW ended when Darth Vader died, thats where the story ended, i dont think any books can have a better plot then the movie series (and books that accampany).Perhaps read the Thrawn Trilogy and Hand of Thrawn Duology by Timothy Zahn. Besides the fact that literature can convey more than film to begin with, Zahn manages to give an emotional side to the characters that Lucas couldn't. To me, those 5 books are better than the prequels and just as much of an important contribution to Star Wars as episodes 4-6.

MatGeo
07-07-2006, 1:36 AM
I read the Thrawn trilogy(never heard of Hand of Thrawn duology). For me it seems that the empire was never defeated. In the trilogy after the emperor and darth vader die, the rebels take control of coruscant and every planet the empire had and placed them under their protection. And they say that the empire is eliminated. Wrong the empire still exists but it has new leaders now(the rebels).

kongurous
07-07-2006, 2:17 AM
The Rebel Alliance was a bunch of criminals. The Empire was formed in the name of peace and security, and under the immense shadow of thousands of Star Destroyers, it was peaceful (til the rebels came) and secure (who's gonna argue with a few hundred turbo lasers in your face?).

The Rebels obviously did not like peace and security, and the money lost by the independent contractors alone for the first Death Star likely set the Empire back even farther than the original dead was. Tacked on to the possible insurance policies of the officers, we're talking tens of billions of credits down the toilet.

At the Battle of Endor, the same problems apply. Billions in insurance, billions from the contractors, hundreds of thousands dead... the body count of the Rebels war for "freedom" was staggering by any account. Even when they toppled the Empire, did not the New Republic nearly crumble... again?

Spartan-II
07-07-2006, 3:21 AM
It was also suggested that Emporer Palpatine saw the invasion of the Yuuzhan Vong, and wanted a stable, powerful, united empire to combat them. Too bad those whiny Rebel bitches had to bring it down. Ruling through terror and an iron fist isn't neccesarily a bad thing.

Ender
07-07-2006, 3:45 PM
It was also suggested that Emporer Palpatine saw the invasion of the Yuuzhan Vong, and wanted a stable, powerful, united empire to combat them. Too bad those whiny Rebel bitches had to bring it down. Ruling through terror and an iron fist isn't neccesarily a bad thing.

No where does it suggest Palpatine foresaw the Vong invasion and took over the galaxy so it would have a military to resist them. Trust me, I've read all the New Jedi Order books multiple times. All it ever says is the Empire was strong enough to crush them in their first encounter at the very least, and most likely defeat the Vong entirely with much more ease than the New Republic/Galactic Alliance did. It never ever ever says that Palpatine knew it was coming.

GenocideAlive
07-07-2006, 4:03 PM
Any time someone says "trust me", I immediately want to slap them in the ballsack.

Honestly, what about ordering someone to believe you makes sense?

Ender
07-07-2006, 5:08 PM
I wish you wouldn't, that hurts an awful lot.

The trust me was support for the fact I HAVE read all the books multiple times, so the chances of me have missed such a remark or not remembering it are quite small.

kongurous
07-07-2006, 5:15 PM
No where does it suggest Palpatine foresaw the Vong invasion and took over the galaxy so it would have a military to resist them. Trust me, I've read all the New Jedi Order books multiple times. All it ever says is the Empire was strong enough to crush them in their first encounter at the very least, and most likely defeat the Vong entirely with much more ease than the New Republic/Galactic Alliance did. It never ever ever says that Palpatine knew it was coming.

Right, cus Stormtroopers who can't shoot their way out of a paper bag and thousands of TIE Fighters = win.

ScottieIWU
07-07-2006, 7:15 PM
It was also suggested that Emporer Palpatine saw the invasion of the Yuuzhan Vong, and wanted a stable, powerful, united empire to combat them. Too bad those whiny Rebel bitches had to bring it down. Ruling through terror and an iron fist isn't neccesarily a bad thing.Well, that's a common theme throughout the EU that's slowly rising. For example, it's being hinted at in KOTOR and KOTORII that generally Revan was attempting to keep the Republic's infrastructure alive and the universe united so that something that would eventually be coming could be fought. It was never said what this was, but considering Mandalore makes references to a ship that fits the Yuuzhan Vong's description, it seems possible that Revan also encoutered them while exploring the Unknown Regions. Imagine the Star Forge's power against the Yuuzhan Vong. That would have greatly altered the tide of war.

It seems like the Yuuzhan Vong were one of those threats that certain people in the galaxy saw coming time and time again but those people were killed or removed from power before they could properly prepare the galaxy against that kind of threat.

It never ever ever says that Palpatine knew it was coming.Yes, but Thrawn did; had the Emperor stayed alive (and the Empire the preeminent force in the galaxy chances are Thrawn would have revealed their coming to the Emperor (had he not already).

Right, cus Stormtroopers who can't shoot their way out of a paper bag and thousands of TIE Fighters = win.I won't necessarily comment on the rightness of this, but I have to say one thing that annoys me is the disparity between the competence of the Stormtroopers in the movie (read: none) and in the EU.

kongurous
07-07-2006, 10:20 PM
I won't necessarily comment on the rightness of this, but I have to say one thing that annoys me is the disparity between the competence of the Stormtroopers in the movie (read: none) and in the EU.

Well, the movies are the only confirmed canon except games made by LucasArts, so... stormtroopers = shitty aim :P

Ubergopher
07-08-2006, 2:15 AM
Right the Empire itself wasn't evil, but how Palpatine went about becoming the Emperor WAS evil. So it just comes down to do the ends justify the means, and I always thought that the SW novels were considered canon. So Stormtroopers=badass.

ScottieIWU
07-08-2006, 11:06 AM
Well, the movies are the only confirmed canon except games made by LucasArts, so... stormtroopers = shitty aim :PYah I've been under the impression that published novels had to go through Lucasarts in order to be published, lest they clash with Lucas' (shitty) ideas for the movies, and therefore were canon.

kongurous
07-08-2006, 12:41 PM
Yah I've been under the impression that published novels had to go through Lucasarts in order to be published, lest they clash with Lucas' (shitty) ideas for the movies, and therefore were canon.

The books are canon-to-be-confirmed. Lucas has referenced the books in his movies. But meh... we're going off-topic.

Ender
07-09-2006, 5:33 PM
The books are considered canon. No way would Lucas just let people fuck around with that.

kongurous
07-09-2006, 6:14 PM
The books are considered canon. No way would Lucas just let people fuck around with that.

Gene Roddenbury let people write books about Star Trek but according to him, they aren't canon. Same as any Star Trek episode not written by him.

GenocideAlive
07-09-2006, 9:29 PM
I don't really think books are canon. There are too many with too many wild storylines that often criss-cross and end up retconning one another. I think the movies are held as canon, and that's about it. Except for the Mandalorians, which are widely contended as George Lucas' mental instability.

ScottieIWU
07-10-2006, 3:01 PM
Except for the Mandalorians, which are widely contended as George Lucas' mental instability.And I always thought that the evidence of Lucas' instability was the prequels.